Section 126 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) (Wrongful Restraint)

by  Adv. Deepak Pandey  

5

5

  

9 mins

  

Understanding Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: Legal Insights into Wrongful Restraint and Its Consequences

Introduction

Introduction to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is a comprehensive legal framework introduced to modernise and replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which has been the cornerstone of criminal law in India since its inception in 1860. The BNS aims to reflect contemporary societal values and address the evolving needs of the Indian legal system. It encompasses various reforms and updates to better protect individual rights, ensure justice, and enhance the efficiency of legal processes.

Overview of Section 126 (2)

Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita specifically addresses the crime of wrongful restraint. According to this section, wrongful restraint occurs when an individual voluntarily obstructs another person, preventing them from proceeding in any direction in which they have the right to proceed. The section stipulates that such an act is punishable by simple imprisonment for up to one month, a fine extending to five thousand rupees or both. This provision is crucial for safeguarding individuals’ freedom of movement and ensuring that no person unlawfully impedes another’s right to move freely.

Have you been a victim of wrongful restraint? Our experienced legal team is here to help you navigate the complexities of Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Schedule your online legal consultation today and take the first step towards justice.

Importance

Understanding wrongful restraint as defined in Section 126 (2) of the BNS is essential for maintaining personal freedom and public order. Wrongful restraint can significantly impact an individual’s daily life, restricting their ability to carry out personal and professional activities. By clearly defining and penalising wrongful restraint, the BNS protects individuals’ fundamental rights and deters potential offenders from engaging in such behaviour.

Moreover, the enforcement of this section helps maintain public order by ensuring that conflicts and disputes do not escalate into unlawful restrictions of movement. It promotes a sense of security and trust within the community, knowing that the legal system upholds and protects their right to move freely without undue interference. Thus, understanding and adhering to Section 126 (2) is vital for fostering a just and orderly society.

Section 126 (2) of BNS: Definition and Scope

Legal Definition

Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) addresses the offense of wrongful restraint. According to this section, wrongful restraint occurs when a person voluntarily obstructs another individual, thereby preventing them from proceeding in any direction in which they have a right to proceed. The law explicitly aims to safeguard individuals’ freedom of movement, ensuring that no one unlawfully restricts another person’s mobility. The provision underlines the seriousness of such offenses and prescribes specific penalties to deter such actions.

Key Elements

  1. Voluntary Obstruction of a Person:
    • This element requires that the obstruction is intentional and voluntary. It is not enough for the obstruction to be accidental or incidental; the act must be done with the purpose of restricting the other person’s movement.
  2. Prevention from Proceeding in Any Direction They Have the Right to:
    • The restriction must prevent the person from moving in a direction they are legally entitled to. This could include public roads, private property they have lawful access to, or any other paths where their right to passage is recognized by law.
  3. Exception for Lawful Obstructions over Private Ways Believed to Be Lawful in Good Faith:
    • An important exception to wrongful restraint is when the obstruction is done in good faith under the belief of having a lawful right to do so. For instance, if someone blocks a private way over their property believing they have the legal right, this does not constitute wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2).

Comparison with IPC

Section 126 of the BNS corresponds closely with Section 339 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which also defines wrongful restraint. However, the BNS introduces clearer definitions and streamlined provisions to reflect modern legal standards and societal needs.

  • Similarity:
    • Both BNS Section 126 and IPC Section 339 define wrongful restraint in nearly identical terms, focusing on the voluntary obstruction of a person’s right to proceed in a certain direction.
    • The penalties prescribed under both laws are comparable, emphasizing imprisonment and fines as deterrents.
  • Differences:
    • The BNS incorporates updated language and potentially broader interpretations to address contemporary issues more effectively.
    • The BNS may provide more detailed illustrations and exceptions to clarify the circumstances under which wrongful restraint can be claimed and defended, offering a more nuanced approach compared to the IPC.

Understanding these elements is crucial for legal practitioners, law enforcement, and the public to ensure the protection of individual rights and the proper application of the law. The provisions under Section 126 (2) of the BNS thus play a vital role in maintaining personal freedom and public order by clearly defining wrongful restraint and its consequences.

Legal Interpretation and Judicial Precedents

Case Laws and Examples

Understanding the legal interpretation of Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) requires analyzing notable cases where courts have applied this provision. Judicial precedents provide insight into how wrongful restraint is interpreted and enforced.

  1. Vijay Kumari Magee vs. Smt. S.R. Rao (1996 Cri. L.J. 1371, S.C.):
    • Fact: A lady teacher, after the termination of her hostel room license, was denied entry by the school authorities, leading to allegations of wrongful restraint.
    • Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that wrongful restraint requires that the person concerned must have a right to proceed. In this case, the court found that the teacher’s right to enter the premises was unjustly obstructed, thus constituting wrongful restraint​​.
  2. Re M. Abraham (AIR 1950 Mad. 233):
    • Fact: A bus driver intentionally stopped the bus, obstructing another bus from proceeding further.
    • Judgment: The court held that the driver’s action constituted wrongful restraint as soon as the obstruction occurred, regardless of whether physical force was used. This case highlighted that wrongful restraint can occur without physical contact​.
  3. State of Gujarat v. Maganbhai Jogani (AIR 2009 S.C 2594):
    • Fact: Officers making an inquiry were briefly restrained in the accused’s house without the use of force.
    • Judgment: The court ruled that the accused did not commit wrongful restraint as there was no use of force or threat thereof. This case emphasized that the mere act of stopping someone without force might not always constitute wrongful restraint​​.
  4. S.A. Aziz vs. Pasam Haribabu (2003 6 Cri.L.J. 2462, A.P.):
    • Fact: A police officer arrested a person wrongfully under a non-bailable warrant and detained him for a week.
    • Judgment: The High Court found the police officer guilty of wrongful confinement, clarifying that physical force is not necessary for wrongful restraint or confinement. The case reinforced that misuse of legal authority can lead to charges of wrongful restraint​​.

Judicial Interpretations and Applications

Judicial interpretations of Section 126 (2) of BNS have provided clarity on various aspects of wrongful restraint:

  • Voluntariness: Courts have consistently emphasized that the obstruction must be voluntary and intentional. Involuntary or accidental obstruction does not qualify as wrongful restraint.
  • Right to Proceed: A critical element is that the obstructed person must have the legal right to proceed in the direction they were heading. This was underscored in the Vijay Kumari Magee case, where the teacher had the right to access the hostel premises​.
  • Use of Force: The necessity of force or the threat of force varies. As seen in the Re M. Abraham case, physical force is not always necessary; obstruction alone can suffice if it prevents lawful movement.
  • Legal Authority: Misuse of legal authority, as demonstrated in S.A. Aziz vs. Pasam Haribabu, can also constitute wrongful restraint, highlighting the importance of lawful exercise of power by public officials​​.

Unsure about your rights under Section 126 (2) of the BNS? Get expert legal advice from our seasoned attorneys. Schedule an online consultation now and understand how you can protect your freedom and seek redress for wrongful restraint.

Illustrations: Hypothetical Scenarios and Real-Life Cases

To further illustrate wrongful restraint, consider these hypothetical and real-life scenarios:

  1. Hypothetical Scenario:
    • Situation: A person blocks another individual’s path in a public park, preventing them from walking along a designated pathway.
    • Legal Analysis: The obstruction is voluntary and without lawful justification, thus constituting wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2).
  2. Real-Life Case:
    • Example: In the Vijay Kumari Magee case, the teacher’s lawful right to enter her hostel room was obstructed by the authorities, which was deemed wrongful restraint by the court​​.
  3. Hypothetical Scenario:
    • Situation: A shopkeeper blocks the entrance of a store, preventing customers from entering because of a personal dispute.
    • Legal Analysis: If the customers have a right to enter the store, the shopkeeper’s action could be considered wrongful restraint.

Consequences and Penalties

Punishments

Under Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the legal framework provides specific punishments for the offense of wrongful restraint to ensure it serves as a deterrent and upholds justice. The penalties are clearly outlined to reflect the severity of the crime and its impact on the victim’s freedom of movement.

  1. Simple Imprisonment for Up to One Month:
    • The law prescribes a term of simple imprisonment for up to one month for anyone found guilty of wrongful restraint. This form of imprisonment is less severe compared to rigorous imprisonment, reflecting the nature of the offense as a violation of personal freedom without necessarily involving physical harm.
  2. Fine Up to Five Thousand Rupees:
    • In addition to or in lieu of imprisonment, the guilty party may be fined up to five thousand rupees. This financial penalty serves as both a punitive and compensatory measure, aiming to deter wrongful restraint through economic consequences.
  3. Both Imprisonment and Fine:
    • In certain cases, the court may deem it appropriate to impose both imprisonment and a fine. This dual penalty underscores the seriousness of the offense and reinforces the importance of safeguarding individuals’ freedom of movement​​.

Impact on the Accused

Being found guilty of wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2) of the BNS can have significant legal and personal repercussions for the accused:

  1. Legal Repercussions:
    • Criminal Record: A conviction results in a criminal record, which can have long-term implications for the accused’s future. This record can affect their ability to secure employment, travel abroad, or engage in certain professions that require a clean legal history.
    • Legal Liability: Beyond the immediate penalties of imprisonment and fines, the accused may also face additional legal liabilities if their actions caused further harm or led to additional charges, such as wrongful confinement or use of force.
  2. Personal Repercussions:
    • Social Stigma: Being convicted of a crime like wrongful restraint can lead to social stigma and isolation. The accused may find themselves ostracized by their community, friends, and even family members, affecting their social relationships and support network.
    • Professional Consequences: A criminal conviction can severely impact professional life. Many employers conduct background checks, and a conviction for wrongful restraint could lead to job loss, difficulty in finding new employment, and damage to professional reputation.
    • Financial Burden: The fines imposed can be a financial burden, especially if combined with legal fees and the potential loss of income due to imprisonment or job termination.
  3. Emotional and Psychological Effects:
    • Stress and Anxiety: The legal process and the consequences of a conviction can cause significant stress and anxiety. The accused may experience feelings of guilt, shame, and fear about the future.
    • Impact on Family: The repercussions extend beyond the individual to their family, who may suffer from the social and financial consequences of the conviction. This can strain family relationships and create a challenging environment for all involved.

Practical Examples

Hypothetical Scenarios

  1. Examples of Actions that Constitute Wrongful Restraint:
    • Blocking a Path: A person stands in the middle of a narrow alleyway, intentionally preventing another person from walking through. Despite being asked to move, the person refuses to allow passage. This action constitutes wrongful restraint as it voluntarily obstructs someone’s movement.
    • Locking a Gate: An individual locks the gate of a shared garden, knowing that a neighbour is inside and needs to leave. By preventing the neighbour from exiting the garden, the individual commits wrongful restraint.
  2. Situations Where Individuals Might Unknowingly Commit This Offense:
    • Dispute Over Parking: During a disagreement over a parking spot, one driver parks their car in such a way that it blocks the other driver’s vehicle from exiting the space. Although the intention may not be malicious, the action constitutes wrongful restraint.
    • Misunderstood Authority: A security guard at a private event stops a guest from leaving, believing it to be part of their job to control the crowd. If the guest has the right to leave and the guard prevents them without lawful justification, it may be considered wrongful restraint.

Real-life Cases

  1. Vijay Kumari Magee vs. Smt. S.R. Rao (1996 Cri. L.J. 1371, S.C.):
    • Fact: A lady teacher was denied entry into her hostel room by school authorities after her room license was terminated.
    • Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that the teacher had the right to access the hostel premises, and the denial constituted wrongful restraint. The court emphasized that the right to proceed must be recognized and unjustly obstructed to qualify as wrongful restraint​​.
  2. Re M. Abraham (AIR 1950 Mad. 233):
    • Fact: A bus driver stopped his vehicle to block another bus from proceeding.
    • Judgment: The court held the driver guilty of wrongful restraint, stating that the obstruction of movement, even without physical force, constituted wrongful restraint. The case highlighted the importance of intention and the right to proceed in defining wrongful restraint​.
  3. State of Gujarat v. Maganbhai Jogani (AIR 2009 S.C 2594):
    • Fact: Inquiry officers were temporarily restrained in the accused’s house without force.
    • Judgment: The court ruled that no wrongful restraint occurred as there was no force or threat of force used. The case underscored the necessity of demonstrating either physical obstruction or the threat thereof to establish wrongful restraint​.
  4. S.A. Aziz vs. Pasam Haribabu (2003 6 Cri.L.J. 2462, A.P.):
    • Fact: A police officer wrongfully arrested and detained an individual under a non-bailable warrant for a week.
    • Judgment: The High Court found the police officer guilty of wrongful confinement, reinforcing that misuse of legal authority and unlawful detention constitute wrongful restraint. The case illustrated that wrongful restraint does not always require physical force but can also involve the unlawful use of authority

Legal Remedies and Victim Support

Steps for Victims: Actions Victims Can Take to Seek Justice

Victims of wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) have several steps they can take to seek justice and ensure their rights are protected:

  1. Document the Incident:
    • Gather Evidence: Collect any evidence that supports the claim of wrongful restraint. This can include photographs, videos, witness statements, and any other relevant documentation that can substantiate the occurrence of the restraint.
    • Detail the Incident: Write a detailed account of the incident, including the time, date, location, and any individuals involved. Clear and precise documentation will aid in building a strong case.
  2. Filing a Complaint:
    • Police Report: The first step is to file a complaint with the local police. Victims should visit the nearest police station and report the incident, providing all collected evidence and a detailed account of the wrongful restraint.
    • First Information Report (FIR): Ensure that an FIR is registered. The FIR is a crucial document in the legal process, and it formally records the victim’s complaint with the police.
  3. Seeking Immediate Legal Assistance:
    • Consult a Lawyer: Engaging a lawyer who specializes in criminal law can provide invaluable guidance. A legal professional can help navigate the complexities of the legal system and ensure that the victim’s rights are upheld.
    • Legal Advice and Representation: The lawyer can offer advice on the best course of action, represent the victim in court if necessary, and help in filing any additional legal documents or motions required for the case.

Legal Remedies

Victims of wrongful restraint have several legal remedies available to them under the BNS:

  1. Criminal Prosecution:
    • Pursue Criminal Charges: The primary remedy is to pursue criminal charges against the perpetrator. Upon filing an FIR, the police will investigate the case and, if sufficient evidence is found, the accused will be prosecuted under Section 126 (2) of the BNS.
    • Court Proceedings: The case will be presented in court, where the victim’s lawyer will present evidence and argue the case. If the accused is found guilty, they will face the prescribed penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
  2. Civil Remedies:
    • Compensation: In addition to criminal prosecution, victims can also pursue civil remedies. They may file a civil lawsuit seeking compensation for any damages suffered as a result of the wrongful restraint. This can include compensation for physical, emotional, and financial harm.
    • Injunction: Victims can seek an injunction to prevent the perpetrator from engaging in similar conduct in the future. This is particularly useful if there is an ongoing threat of wrongful restraint.

Support Systems: NGOs and Legal Aid Organizations

Several NGOs and legal aid organizations offer support to victims of wrongful restraint, providing resources, legal assistance, and advocacy:

  1. NGOs:
    • Human Rights Organizations: NGOs dedicated to human rights often provide support to victims of wrongful restraint. They can offer legal advice, assist in documenting the case, and provide emotional support.
    • Women’s Rights Organizations: These organizations focus on protecting the rights of women and can be particularly helpful in cases where the victim is a woman facing wrongful restraint or similar offenses.
  2. Legal Aid Organizations:
    • Free Legal Services: Organizations like the Legal Services Authorities provide free legal services to those who cannot afford a lawyer. They can help victims navigate the legal system and ensure they receive the necessary legal representation.
    • Pro Bono Legal Assistance: Many law firms and individual lawyers offer pro bono services, providing free legal assistance to victims of wrongful restraint.
  3. Government Support Services:
    • Victim Support Units: Some police departments and government agencies have victim support units that offer counselling, legal assistance, and other support services to victims of crime, including wrongful restraint.

Preventive Measures and Public Awareness

Strategies: Methods to Prevent Wrongful Restraint Incidents

  1. Legal Education and Training:
    • Workshops and Seminars: Conduct workshops and seminars for the public, law enforcement, and legal professionals to educate them about the specifics of wrongful restraint, its legal implications, and how to prevent it.
    • School and Community Programs: Implement educational programs in schools and communities to teach children and adults about personal rights and the importance of respecting others’ freedoms.
  2. Public Surveillance and Security:
    • Increased Surveillance: Install surveillance cameras in public places to deter potential wrongdoers and provide evidence in cases of wrongful restraint.
    • Security Personnel Training: Train security personnel to recognize and respond appropriately to incidents of wrongful restraint, ensuring they understand the legal boundaries of their authority.
  3. Conflict Resolution Mechanisms:
    • Mediation Services: Promote the use of mediation and conflict resolution services to address disputes before they escalate into wrongful restraint.
    • Community Dialogue: Encourage open dialogue within communities to resolve conflicts amicably and prevent situations that could lead to wrongful restraint.
  4. Legal Reforms and Enforcement:
    • Strict Enforcement: Ensure that laws regarding wrongful restraint are strictly enforced, with prompt and fair action taken against offenders.
    • Policy Updates: Regularly update legal policies to address new forms of wrongful restraint and adapt to changing societal contexts.

Public Awareness: Importance of Educating the Public About Their Rights and Legal Provisions

  1. Information Campaigns:
    • Public Service Announcements: Use television, radio, and social media platforms to disseminate information about wrongful restraint, legal rights, and the steps individuals can take if they are victims.
    • Printed Materials: Distribute pamphlets, posters, and brochures in public places, schools, and community centers outlining the legal definitions and consequences of wrongful restraint.
  2. Educational Programs:
    • Legal Literacy Programs: Implement legal literacy programs that educate the public about their rights and the legal provisions related to wrongful restraint. These programs can be run by NGOs, legal aid organizations, and community groups.
    • Interactive Workshops: Conduct interactive workshops that allow participants to role-play scenarios involving wrongful restraint and learn how to handle such situations legally and safely.
  3. Online Resources:
    • Dedicated Websites and Helplines: Develop websites and helplines that provide comprehensive information about wrongful restraint, including how to report incidents and seek legal help.
    • Social Media Campaigns: Utilize social media platforms to create awareness about wrongful restraint and share real-life stories to illustrate its impact and legal recourse.

Role of Law Enforcement and Community: Collaborative Efforts to Prevent Wrongful Restraint

  1. Law Enforcement Training:
    • Specialized Training Programs: Provide specialized training for law enforcement officers on identifying, preventing, and responding to wrongful restraint cases. This includes understanding the legal nuances and respecting the rights of individuals.
    • Community Policing: Encourage community policing initiatives where officers build relationships with community members, fostering trust and collaboration in preventing wrongful restraint and other crimes.
  2. Community Involvement:
    • Neighborhood Watch Programs: Establish neighborhood watch programs where community members actively participate in monitoring and reporting suspicious activities, including potential wrongful restraint incidents.
    • Community Leaders and Influencers: Engage community leaders and influencers to advocate against wrongful restraint and promote awareness about legal rights and protections.
  3. Collaborative Efforts:
    • Partnerships with NGOs and Legal Aid Organizations: Law enforcement agencies can partner with NGOs and legal aid organizations to provide comprehensive support to victims of wrongful restraint, including legal advice and emotional support.
    • Public Forums and Dialogues: Organize public forums and dialogues where community members, law enforcement, and legal experts can discuss issues related to wrongful restraint, share experiences, and develop strategies to prevent such incidents.

Conclusion

Understanding and addressing wrongful restraint as defined in Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is crucial for protecting personal freedom and maintaining public order. Legal provisions, judicial interpretations, and practical examples highlight the significance of this offense and the importance of preventing it.

By educating the public, implementing preventive measures, and fostering collaboration between law enforcement and communities, we can effectively deter wrongful restraint and ensure that individuals’ rights are upheld.

Wrongful restraint can disrupt your life and violate your rights. Our dedicated lawyers provide comprehensive online legal consultations to help you fight back. Contact us today to learn about your legal options and remedies.

Frequently Asked Questions on Section 126 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) (Wrongful Restraint)

Q1. What is Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?
Ans1. Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) defines wrongful restraint as the voluntary obstruction of a person, preventing them from proceeding in any direction they have the right to. The offense is punishable by simple imprisonment for up to one month, a fine of up to five thousand rupees, or both.

Q2. What are the penalties for wrongful restraint under BNS Section 126 (2)?
Ans2. The penalties for wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2) of the BNS include simple imprisonment for up to one month, a fine of up to five thousand rupees, or both.

Q3. How does Section 126 (2) of BNS compare to similar provisions in the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Ans3. Section 126 (2) of BNS is similar to Section 339 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), both defining wrongful restraint as voluntary obstruction of a person’s lawful movement. However, BNS provides updated language and potentially broader interpretations to reflect modern legal standards.

Q4. What legal steps can victims of wrongful restraint take?
Ans4. Victims of wrongful restraint can take several steps, including documenting the incident, filing a complaint with the police, ensuring an FIR is registered, and seeking immediate legal assistance from a lawyer.

Q5. What support systems are available for victims of wrongful restraint?
Ans5. Support systems for victims of wrongful restraint include NGOs dedicated to human rights, women’s rights organizations, legal aid organizations providing free services, and government victim support units offering counselling and legal assistance.

Q6. Can you provide examples of wrongful restraint under Section 126 (2) of BNS? Ans6. Examples of wrongful restraint include blocking a person’s path in a public place, locking a gate to prevent someone from exiting, or a driver blocking another vehicle in a parking dispute.

Q7. What are some real-life cases involving wrongful restraint?
Ans7. Notable cases include Vijay Kumari Magee vs. Smt. S.R. Rao, where a teacher was denied entry into her hostel room, and Re M. Abraham, where a bus driver intentionally blocked another bus. Both cases were ruled as wrongful restraint by the courts.

Q8. How can wrongful restraint incidents be prevented?
Ans8. Preventive measures include legal education and training, increased public surveillance, conflict resolution mechanisms, and strict enforcement of laws. Public awareness campaigns and community policing also play crucial roles in prevention.

Q9. Why is public awareness about wrongful restraint important?
Ans9. Public awareness about wrongful restraint is important to educate individuals about their legal rights, prevent the occurrence of such incidents, and ensure that victims know the steps to seek justice and support.

Q10. What role do law enforcement and the community play in preventing wrongful restraint?
Ans10. Law enforcement and the community play a crucial role in preventing wrongful restraint through specialized training for officers, community policing initiatives, neighbourhood watch programs, and partnerships with NGOs and legal aid organizations.

If you or someone you know has been affected by wrongful restraint, it's crucial to understand your rights and take immediate action. Our experienced legal team specializes in cases under Section 126 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. We offer personalized online legal consultations to guide you through the legal process and help you achieve justice.

Adv. Deepak Pandey

Adv. Deepak Pandey

5

5 | 150+ User Reviews

Deepak Pandey offers legal consultancy and advisory services with a keen emphasis on ethical and professional conduct to achieve favourable results. He has 5 years of experience in handling legal cases. As a result of his strong communication skills, Deepak is able to present his clients' cases with clarity and persuasion.

See more...

Talk to Lawyer

Avail 30% discount


Related Articles

TOP

ezyLegal

Get Useful tips and Product info


Our Company

ezyLegal is for the people who are determined to succeed, the goals that motivate them, the loved ones who inspire them. We are for technology that makes it easy, lawyers and accountants who make it seem effortless. For the many people who want to start a business, for the many families who depend on them, for the many ideas they need to protect, we are ezyLegal, with you, every step of the way.

Chat with a Legal Expert

lawyer picEva

Hi there 👋!

Hi there 👋!

How can I help you?

lawyer pic